<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question: What&#8217;s the lowest-hanging fruit for local news sites?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joethink.com/blog/2007/02/question-whats-the-lowest-hanging-fruit-for-local-news-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joethink.com/blog/2007/02/question-whats-the-lowest-hanging-fruit-for-local-news-sites/</link>
	<description>A Denver web developer and journalist's thoughts on local online journalism, community, context and storytelling.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 22:05:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2-bleeding</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanBlanda.com podcast-Episode 1-Joe Murphy &#187; SeanBlanda.com</title>
		<link>http://joethink.com/blog/2007/02/question-whats-the-lowest-hanging-fruit-for-local-news-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanBlanda.com podcast-Episode 1-Joe Murphy &#187; SeanBlanda.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 20:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joethink.com/blog/?p=49#comment-333</guid>
		<description>[...] On his blog he discourages the &#8220;cut and paste approach&#8221; than what? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On his blog he discourages the &#8220;cut and paste approach&#8221; than what? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://joethink.com/blog/2007/02/question-whats-the-lowest-hanging-fruit-for-local-news-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 05:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joethink.com/blog/?p=49#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Hi Laura -- that&#039;s a fine question that points at the &quot;baby steps&quot; vs. &quot;overhaul it&quot; debate, which comes down to the challenge of getting the right person / people to say &quot;overhaul it&quot; ... and if the folk in management don&#039;t know why RSS matters, or why what passes for newspaper web sites is not adequate...heck, then somebody oughta show &#039;em.

... and you&#039;re right about the distance that workflow fruit hangs off the ground, I put it in there because it&#039;s got a huge n&#039; obvious payoff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Laura &#8212; that&#8217;s a fine question that points at the &#8220;baby steps&#8221; vs. &#8220;overhaul it&#8221; debate, which comes down to the challenge of getting the right person / people to say &#8220;overhaul it&#8221; &#8230; and if the folk in management don&#8217;t know why RSS matters, or why what passes for newspaper web sites is not adequate&#8230;heck, then somebody oughta show &#8216;em.</p>
<p>&#8230; and you&#8217;re right about the distance that workflow fruit hangs off the ground, I put it in there because it&#8217;s got a huge n&#8217; obvious payoff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LauraFries.com</title>
		<link>http://joethink.com/blog/2007/02/question-whats-the-lowest-hanging-fruit-for-local-news-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>LauraFries.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joethink.com/blog/?p=49#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Can I get an amen? I think that is the lowest hanging fruit indeed - but unfortunately, one of the most vested and complicated mechanisms in a newsroom. Think of the machine - geared to produce copy for the front-end publishing system, a series of steps involving print editors and proofreaders - the layout and pagination process, and the final edits. 

Ah, clumsy. 

Instead of advocating the improvement of the Print &gt; Online production mechanisms, how about changing the entire production process entirely? 

How about Content ___ Online
			        ___ Print
	   		        ___ SMS 
			        ___ RSS
			        ___ Future Distribution Methods 

v.s. 

Content &gt; Print Production &gt; Magic &gt; Online Production</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I get an amen? I think that is the lowest hanging fruit indeed &#8211; but unfortunately, one of the most vested and complicated mechanisms in a newsroom. Think of the machine &#8211; geared to produce copy for the front-end publishing system, a series of steps involving print editors and proofreaders &#8211; the layout and pagination process, and the final edits. </p>
<p>Ah, clumsy. </p>
<p>Instead of advocating the improvement of the Print &gt; Online production mechanisms, how about changing the entire production process entirely? </p>
<p>How about Content ___ Online<br />
			        ___ Print<br />
	   		        ___ SMS<br />
			        ___ RSS<br />
			        ___ Future Distribution Methods </p>
<p>v.s. </p>
<p>Content &gt; Print Production &gt; Magic &gt; Online Production</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question: How have online publishers innovated with local community? : Joe Think &#187; Online News Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://joethink.com/blog/2007/02/question-whats-the-lowest-hanging-fruit-for-local-news-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Question: How have online publishers innovated with local community? : Joe Think &#187; Online News Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joethink.com/blog/?p=49#comment-227</guid>
		<description>[...] Each time I see that last question I wrote I dislike it more. Out with bad ideas, in with new ones (and give the new ones a couple weeks until they&#8217;re allowed to be called bad). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Each time I see that last question I wrote I dislike it more. Out with bad ideas, in with new ones (and give the new ones a couple weeks until they&#8217;re allowed to be called bad). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

