Skip to content


I like this what-if: The new news beats

All-about-the-words journalism-blog Gangrey sparked a thread with its recent post, New Rules:

If you got to blow up your newspaper, effectively immediately, meaning even the potential elimination of the traditional, nuts-and-bolts beats – cops, city hall, school board – and if you then got to rethink completely how we harvest stories …

What would the “beats” be?

Great question. It got a bunch of responses too, here are my favorites from the contributions:

  • Stories Where People Voluntarily Get Out Their Old Yearbooks
  • Collision (cars, people, ideas, whatever)
  • Pieces of furniture that cost under $500
  • Contentment. Or, what people do when they don’t have to do anything
  • Politicians who are (not) helping
  • Businesses that are not chains
  • Secrets
  • Things we accept but shouldn’t
  • The things we do, but do not talk about

And these are the ideas I contributed:

  • Red: News and local ephemera that has to do with that color.
  • Last Month, Last Year: What matters now about what happened around here 13 months ago?
  • Oooops: Who out there is making the ‘best’ mistakes, and how do they do it?
  • PGs and QBs: Point guards and quarterbacks in the news.
  • Five Years: News and ephemera about five-year-olds.
  • Running on Empty: “Running out of gas”-related news and stuff

What I like about the Gangrey post and the ideas it sparked is the idea of the world worth talking about that doesn’t fit within the usual definitions of what makes a news or feature article.

Popularity: 54% [?]

Posted in Ideas, Journalism, Online, Storytelling, Themes, What If?.

0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Some HTML is OK

(required)

(required, but never shared)

or, reply to this post via trackback.